From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michael P. v. Perlman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 16, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-09-16

In the Matter of MICHAEL P. (Anonymous), appellant. Barry Perlman, etc., respondent.


Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Mineola, N.Y. (Michael Neville, Scott Wells, Dennis B. Feld, and Felicia Bromes of counsel), for appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law §§ 9.35 and 9.60(m) for the involuntary assisted outpatient treatment of Michael P., Michael P. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), dated March 15, 2013, which, after a hearing, granted the petition, and directed him to comply with an assisted outpatient treatment plan for a period of six months.

By order to show cause dated January 9, 2014, this Court, inter alia, directed the parties to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from the order on the ground that the appeal has been rendered academic. By decision and order on motion dated March 3, 2014, this Court held the motion to dismiss the appeal in abeyance, and referred it to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order at issue on the instant appeal has expired by its own terms. The appeal has been rendered academic, and does not warrant the invocation of an exception to the mootness doctrine ( see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 713–716, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876; Matter of Anonymous [South Beach Psychiatric Ctr.], 114 A.D.3d 675, 676, 980 N.Y.S.2d 125; Matter of Yuri M. [Karpati], 107 A.D.3d 999, 1000, 966 N.Y.S.2d 883; cf. Matter of Walsh–Tozer v. Luis G., 118 A.D.3d 897, 989 N.Y.S.2d 41). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic. RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Michael P. v. Perlman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 16, 2015
131 A.D.3d 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Michael P. v. Perlman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL P. (Anonymous), appellant. Barry Perlman, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 16, 2015

Citations

131 A.D.3d 1061 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
131 A.D.3d 1061
131 A.D.3d 1062
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6823

Citing Cases

O'Brien v. Brenda H.

Thus, adjudication of the merits will not "result in immediate and practical consequences to the parties" (…

O'Brien v. Brenda H.

Thus, adjudication of the merits will not "result in immediate and practical consequences to the parties"…