From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miceli v. Tramutolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1997
237 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 24, 1997.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated March 26, 1996, as denied its motion to limit the damages recoverable against it.

Before: Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff, a pedestrian, was injured when she was struck by a vehicle operated by the defendant Gloria A. Tramutolo, who had leased the vehicle, pursuant to a long-term lease, from the defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (hereinafter Nissan). We reject Nissan's contention that vicarious liability under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 should be limited to the minimum amount of insurance required pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 370 ( cf., Morris v Snappy Car Rental, 84 NY2d 21).


Summaries of

Miceli v. Tramutolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1997
237 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Miceli v. Tramutolo

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA MICELI, Respondent, v. GLORIA A. TRAMUTOLO et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 591

Citing Cases

Fedyszyn v. Rubin

He is therefore vicariously liable to plaintiff D. Fedyszyn for her injuries arising out of the acts and/or…