From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miami Conservancy District v. Bucher

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 3, 1950
92 N.E.2d 813 (Ohio 1950)

Opinion

No. 32124

Decided May 3, 1950.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Conservancy district assessments — Action to collect delinquent assessments — Interest charge on unpaid installments — Penalties — Section 6828-45, General Code — Claim interest charge should be capitalized and included in principal — Statutory construction — Due process — Sections 1 and 19, Article I, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery county.

Mr. Alfred Swift Frank, for appellee.

Miss Gertrude A. Bucher, for appellants.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miami Conservancy District v. Bucher

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 3, 1950
92 N.E.2d 813 (Ohio 1950)
Case details for

Miami Conservancy District v. Bucher

Case Details

Full title:THE MIAMI CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, APPELLEE v. BUCHER ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 3, 1950

Citations

92 N.E.2d 813 (Ohio 1950)
92 N.E.2d 813