From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miami Beach v. City of Miami Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1991
579 So. 2d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2046.

June 4, 1991.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Dade County, Appellate Division, Murray Goldman, Steven D. Robinson, and Philip Bloom, Judges.

David Soshuk, Miami Beach, for petitioner.

Laurence Feingold, City Atty., and Sandra W. Schneider, Asst. City Atty., for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ.


The petitioner has standing to challenge only the procedural legality, rather than the wisdom of the municipal decision below. Save Brickell Ave., Inc. v. City of Miami, 395 So.2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Save Brickell Ave., Inc. v. City of Miami, 393 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). On that issue, it has failed completely to establish, as it argues, that the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court departed from the essential requirements of the law in concluding that the Miami Beach City Commission had properly effected an abandonment of the city's air rights over a particular street by resolution, rather than by ordinance. In accordance with City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1982), the petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.


Summaries of

Miami Beach v. City of Miami Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1991
579 So. 2d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Miami Beach v. City of Miami Beach

Case Details

Full title:MIAMI BEACH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., PETITIONER, v. CITY OF MIAMI…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 4, 1991

Citations

579 So. 2d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Peacock v. City of Miami

The Club in this case, a representative association, lacks standing to challenge the Board's decision on any…