From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meza v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Feb 15, 2019
S242799 (Cal. Feb. 15, 2019)

Opinion

S242799

02-15-2019

MEZA (JULIA C.) v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC


Opinion filed

We answer the Ninth Circuit's question as follows: Section 98(a) requires an affiant to provide an address within 150 miles of the place of trial at which lawful service can be made of a form of process that directs the affiant to attend trial. Although a subpoena normally must be personally served, in some circumstances witnesses can be summoned to appear at trial without service of process upon the witness personally. Thus, section 98(a) does not categorically require that all affiants be personally present at a location within 150 miles of the place of trial for a reasonable period within 20 days prior to trial. Such presence is required only if it is necessary for lawful service at that address of process designed to secure the affiant's attendance at trial.

Majority Opinion by Cantil-Sakauye, C. J.

-- joined by Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, and Jenkins*, JJ.

* Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.


Summaries of

Meza v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Feb 15, 2019
S242799 (Cal. Feb. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Meza v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:MEZA (JULIA C.) v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Feb 15, 2019

Citations

S242799 (Cal. Feb. 15, 2019)