Meza v. Meza

Full title: MARIA MEZA, Plaintiff, v. BLADIMIR MEZA, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: May 25, 2013

SA CV 12-01777-GAF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. May. 25, 2013)

Opinion

MARIA MEZA, Plaintiff, v. BLADIMIR MEZA, et al., Defendants. No. SA CV 12-01777-GAF (VBK) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. May 25, 2013

         

         ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, AND (3) DISMISSING THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court (1) accepts the findings and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, (2) grants Defendants Michael Riley, Mike Ryan, Minda Harman, Esther Vega, Tania Cruz and April Wright's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; and (3) directs that Judgment be entered dismissing the First Amended Complaint, and the action, with prejudice.