From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Scutieri

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 14, 1989
539 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

reversing trial court’s refusal under rule 1.540(b) to vacate an order requiring nonparties to pay attorney’s fees

Summary of this case from Stuart v. State

Opinion

No. 88-654.

March 14, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John A. Tanksley, Jr., J.

Friedman, Baur, Miller Webner and Dale Webner, Miami, for appellants.

Hal S. Vogel, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.


This is an appeal by Mortimer Meyer and certain other condominium unit owners at Sunrise Point Condominium from an adverse trial court order which denied their motion to vacate, in part, an attorney's fees order insofar as it awarded attorney's fees not only against Sunrise Point Condominium Association, Inc., the losing plaintiff in a suit brought below against the appellees herein, but also against "each of the members of the class it represents, jointly and severally. . . ." Appellants sought to vacate the quoted portion of the attorney's fee order under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540. We reverse the order appealed from upon a holding that the trial court had no jurisdiction in this unsuccessful class action suit to enter an attorney's fee award against every member of the subject class, jointly and severally. This is so because (a) the final judgment was entered solely against Sunrise Point Condominium Association, Inc., which was sole plaintiff in the last operative complaint in this case, and (b) an attorney's fee award may only be entered, where appropriate, against the losing party to the lawsuit and cannot be entered, as here, against non-parties. See Johnson v. Schneegold, 419 So.2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Dade County v. Grossman, 354 So.2d 131, 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

The order under review is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions (1) to grant the appellants' motion to vacate, and (2) to allow the plaintiff Sunrise Point Condominium Association, Inc. to assess each class member a pro rata share of the subject attorney's fee award in accordance with the Florida Condominium Statute. §§ 718.115(2), 718.119(1), Fla. Stat. (1987).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Meyer v. Scutieri

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 14, 1989
539 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

reversing trial court’s refusal under rule 1.540(b) to vacate an order requiring nonparties to pay attorney’s fees

Summary of this case from Stuart v. State

referring to class members as "non-parties"

Summary of this case from Addison v. City of Tampa
Case details for

Meyer v. Scutieri

Case Details

Full title:MORTIMER MEYER, RODNEY R. YOUNG, JR., GEORGE JACK, DORIS S. BROWN, ELEANOR…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 14, 1989

Citations

539 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Stuart v. State

[1, 2] A nonparty who has not been given notice that monetary relief is sought against it may move under rule…

Pyszka, Kessler, et al. v. Mullin

The District Court disagreed, holding that there was no authority for the award of costs against persons who…