From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Evans

Supreme Court of Utah
Oct 16, 1964
395 P.2d 726 (Utah 1964)

Opinion

No. 10130.

October 16, 1964.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Ray Van Cott, Jr., J.

Maxwell Bentley, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Allen M. Swan, Salt Lake City, for respondents.


Appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs in a case where, under a written leasehold, plaintiffs assert a claim for unpaid rentals, and defendants say they were forgiven by plaintiffs' taking possession after defendants' abandonment of the property. Affirmed with costs to plaintiffs.

The defendants, after signing a lease, left the property several months before the lease term. The evidence indicates that this was done without knowledge of the lessors, who upon becoming acquainted with this fact, without being able to get the key from defendants, took possession, changed locks on the back door, but not the front door, of the premises, advertised for re-lease or sale and, in our opinion, did about everything a landlord could have done to preserve the property and mitigate any damages.

The trial court gave judgment for unpaid rentals, and we concur with him under the facts of this case.

McDONOUGH, CALLISTER, CROCKETT and WADE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meyer v. Evans

Supreme Court of Utah
Oct 16, 1964
395 P.2d 726 (Utah 1964)
Case details for

Meyer v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:HARRY G. MEYER AND IRIS G. MEYER, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS, v. DAVID M…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Oct 16, 1964

Citations

395 P.2d 726 (Utah 1964)
16 Utah 2

Citing Cases

Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.

In those cases, the Court spoke favorably of, at a minimum, allowing landlords to mitigate by reletting…

In re Mountain States Sports, Inc.

The question of surrender, being generally one of fact as to what was the intention of the parties, is to be…