From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metz v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 1978
61 A.D.2d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

March 9, 1978


Appeal from a judgment, entered August 12, 1976, upon a decision of the Court of Claims. At approximately 1:00 P.M. on September 28, 1973, claimant was injured in a fall when his bicycle struck an object while he was riding in a southerly direction on the west sidewalk beside New York State Route 111 in the Town of Smithtown, Suffolk County. Upon regaining his senses after the mishap, he observed a fallen metal signpost for a "No Standing or Parking" sign lying across the walk, and, based on the assumption that this was the object which had precipitated his fall, he subsequently commenced the present action against the State. Following a trial, the court concluded that claimant was free from contributory negligence and that the State was liable to him in negligence because of the dangerous condition which resulted from the signpost lying across the walk. Accordingly, claimant was awarded a judgment in the amount of $2,500, and this appeal ensued. We hold that the judgment appealed from must be reversed. There was absolutely no evidence produced at the trial that the State in any way created the dangerous condition complained of and, even assuming, arguendo, that the State had an inadequate inspection system for its road signs in Suffolk County as found by the court, there was likewise no proof that a proper inspection system would have discovered the fallen sign prior to the accident. Indeed, on the instant record, the sign in question could well have been knocked down only moments before claimant's mishap or even as a consequence thereof, and such being the case, there was simply no adequate basis upon which it could be found that the State had either actual or constructive notice of the condition. Under these circumstances, the imposition of liability on the State was clearly erroneous (cf. Beutenmiller v West End Tavern, 1 N.Y.2d 652, mot for rearg den 1 N.Y.2d 859; Pascual v State of New York, 23 A.D.2d 518). We reach no other issue. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and claim dismissed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Staley, Jr., Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Metz v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 1978
61 A.D.2d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Metz v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN METZ, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, CHARLES METZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1978

Citations

61 A.D.2d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)