From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metropolitan Prty. Liability v. Finlayson

Utah Court of Appeals
Jan 9, 1989
766 P.2d 437 (Utah Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 860204-CA.

January 9, 1989.

Anthony M. Thurber, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.

Lowell V. Smith, Hanson, Dunn, Epperson Smith, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

Before BENCH, BILLINGS and ORME, JJ.


ORDER


This appeal was initially decided by opinion dated March 7, 1988. See Metropolitan Prop. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Finlayson, 751 P.2d 254 (Utah Ct.App. 1988). Respondent subsequently filed a petition for rehearing, which was granted. The court heard reargument and took the matter under advisement. Prior to any further disposition by the court, the parties entered into a settlement. With the appeal thus resolved, there is no "case or controversy" which this court may properly now decide. However, the court considers it inappropriate that its initial opinion stand since rehearing had been granted and the court had determined that reconsideration of its opinion was in order.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, the case is remanded to district court for further proceedings consistent with the stipulation of the parties, and the court's initial opinion herein is vacated.


Summaries of

Metropolitan Prty. Liability v. Finlayson

Utah Court of Appeals
Jan 9, 1989
766 P.2d 437 (Utah Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Metropolitan Prty. Liability v. Finlayson

Case Details

Full title:METROPOLITAN PROPERTY LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF AND…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 9, 1989

Citations

766 P.2d 437 (Utah Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Valentine v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Although this court directly addressed some of the possible meanings of "regular use" in Metropolitan…

Imperial Sav. Ass'n v. Lewis

In a related argument, Imperial contends that since "permissible arbitration provisions" had no meaning…