From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metropolitan Dade County v. Evans

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 20, 1985
474 So. 2d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Summary

holding that the defendant police officer, who was joined in a civil damages action arising out of his official duties, had "prevailed" when the case brought against him was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to settlement with his employer, and he was therefore entitled to reimbursement of attorney fees

Summary of this case from Mills v. Vero Beach Country Club, Inc.

Opinion

No. 85-568.

August 20, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, James C. Henderson, J.

Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Roy Wood, Asst. County Atty., for appellant.

Richard L. Katz, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.


The trial court held that the appellee, a police officer who was joined as a co-defendant with his employer, Dade County, in a civil damage action arising out of his official duties, had "prevailed" when the case against him was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to a settlement effected by the county, and that he was therefore entitled to reimbursement of his attorney's fees under section 111.07, Florida Statutes (1983). See generally, Nuzum v. Valdes, 407 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Since the dismissal operated to terminate finally any proceeding against the officer, see Sacks v. Rickles, 155 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), and, as we held in State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Hall, 409 So.2d 193, 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), "a merits determination is not a prerequisite to an award of attorney's fees where the statute provides that they will inure to the party who prevails", the order is

The section provides:
Any agency of the state, or any county, municipality, or political subdivision of the state, is authorized to provide an attorney to defend any civil action arising from a complaint for damages or injury suffered as a result of any act or omission of action of any of its officers, employees, or agents for an act or omission arising out of and in the scope of his employment or function. . . . If any agency of the state or any county, municipality, or political subdivision of the state is authorized pursuant to this section to provide an attorney to defend a civil action arising from a complaint for damages or injury suffered as a result of any act or omission of action of any of its officers, employees, or agents and fails to provide such attorney, such agency, county, municipality, or political subdivision shall reimburse any such defendant who prevails in the action for court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Metropolitan Dade County v. Evans

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 20, 1985
474 So. 2d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

holding that the defendant police officer, who was joined in a civil damages action arising out of his official duties, had "prevailed" when the case brought against him was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to settlement with his employer, and he was therefore entitled to reimbursement of attorney fees

Summary of this case from Mills v. Vero Beach Country Club, Inc.
Case details for

Metropolitan Dade County v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, APPELLANT, v. HERBERT EVANS, JR., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 20, 1985

Citations

474 So. 2d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

City of Fort Walton Beach v. Grant

Therefore, he was not entitled to attorney's fees under section 111.07. We disagree and affirm the trial…

Thornber v. City of Ft. Walton Beach

Stuart Plaza, Ltd. v. Atlantic Coast Development Corp., 493 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). A determination…