From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metro Sports Sales v. Spenco Medical Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1998
252 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties' agreement was duly terminated by written notice which the plaintiff acknowledged. Pursuant to the terms of their agreement, the commissions due the plaintiff were limited to only the orders it sold as they were shipped. The plaintiffs unsupported assertions to the contrary did not raise a material issue of fact in this regard and thus were insufficient to defeat the defendants' motion for partial summary judgment ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562; Greenman Constr. Corp. v. Incorporated Vil. of Northport, 209 A.D.2d 565).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, without merit ( see, Croce v. Marisi, 234 A.D.2d 333).

Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Metro Sports Sales v. Spenco Medical Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1998
252 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Metro Sports Sales v. Spenco Medical Corp.

Case Details

Full title:METRO SPORTS SALES, INC., Appellant, v. SPENCO MEDICAL CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
676 N.Y.S.2d 492

Citing Cases

R.J. Hyland, Inc. v. Love Family Sports, LLC

The defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that only the $27,000 security deposit was transferred from…

Production Products Company v. Vision Corp.

There is no basis for recovery of commissions beyond those provided for in the Agreement. Defendant may not…