From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metro Obras v. Federal Deposit Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 19, 1993
611 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-1566.

January 19, 1993.

An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ronald M. Friedman, Judge.

Taylor, Brion, Buker Greene and Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellants.

Popham, Haik, Schnobrich Kaufman and Wendy F. Lumish and Jose A. Loredo, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


In the order now under review, the trial court set aside a dismissal for lack of prosecution on the ground that the plaintiff had not been given appropriate notice. See Harris v. Filmon, 358 So.2d 905 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). This order was properly entered pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b) and is therefore affirmed. Kanecke v. Lennar Homes, Inc., 543 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Falkner v. AmeriFirst Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The merits of a dismissal under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e) remain to be decided below.


Summaries of

Metro Obras v. Federal Deposit Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 19, 1993
611 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Metro Obras v. Federal Deposit Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:METRO OBRAS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 19, 1993

Citations

611 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Lesinski v. S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist.

By our conclusion in the instant case, we do not mean to suggest that a party who has not received a proper…