From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Messing v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1955
285 App. Div. 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

March 28, 1955.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order granting the motion of defendant City of New York to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, unless the case be placed on the calendar for the next available term. Order modified by striking from the ordering paragraph everything following the word "granted". As thus modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Respondents failed to explain or excuse the delay of more than forty-one months in bringing the case on for trial. On the facts disclosed by the record, appellant was entitled to dismissal of the complaint without condition, and it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny appellant such relief. ( Lange v. Bagish, 285 App. Div. 833; Beer-Meisel Lodge No. 8 Ind. Order Brith Abraham v. Herschbein, 270 App. Div. 847.) MacCrate, Acting P.J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Messing v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1955
285 App. Div. 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Messing v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA MESSING et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Mancino v. City of New York

The motion should have been unconditionally granted. ( Lange v. Bagish, 285 App. Div. 833; Messing v. City of…

Greener v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay of over seventeen years in bringing the case on…