From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mesher v. Combs

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 15, 1997
685 So. 2d 1391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

CASE NOS. 96-0726 96-0832

Opinion filed January 15, 1997

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Robert Makemson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 94-0274-CA-03.

C. David Tangora of C. David Tangora, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.


This appeal requires us to consider the individual liability of corporate officers under the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act. Appellant, a disenchanted investor in appellees' business ventures, filed a multi-count complaint against appellees. Following a non-jury trial, the trial court found that appellee Historical Shipwreck Salvors, Inc. (HSSI) violated section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1993), by making material misrepresentations that were relied on by appellant in his decision to purchase an interest in HSSI. Pursuant to section 517.211, the trial court ordered rescission of the purchase, which included return of the appellant's $30,000 investment with pre-judgment interest. Although the trial court found HSSI liable for damages, appellant argues that the trial court erred by not also finding Suzanne and Robert Combs individually liable. We agree.

Section 517.301, Florida Statutes (1993), states in relevant part:
(1) It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this chapter for a person:
(a) In connection with the . . . offer, sale, or purchase of any investment or security . . . directly or indirectly:
1. To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
2. To obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or
3. To engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person.

Sections 517.011-517.32 comprise the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act. Its purpose is to "protect the public from fraudulent and deceptive practices in the sale and marketing of securities." Arthur Young Co. v. Mariner Corp., 630 So.2d 1199, 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Subsection 517.211(2) imposes individual liability on persons participating or aiding in the sale of securities as follows:

Any person purchasing or selling a security in violation of s. 517.301, and every director, officer, partner, or agent of or for the purchaser or seller, if the director, officer, partner, or agent has personally participated or aided in making the sale or purchase, is jointly and severally liable to the person selling the security to or purchasing the security from such person in an action for rescission, if the plaintiff still owns the security,or for damages, if the plaintiff has sold the security.

Suzanne and Robert Combs were corporate officers of HSSI, a closely-held corporation, and were the individuals who made the statements found by the trial court to constitute material misrepresentations. Because it is uncontroverted that Suzanne and Robert Combs personally participated or aided in making these statements, they are jointly and severally liable to appellant, along with their corporation, HSSI. See § 517.211(2); Whigham v. Muehl, 500 So.2d 1374, 1380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's final judgment in favor of appellees Suzanne and Robert Combs on Count VII. Our reversal on this point compels a reversal of the final judgment for attorney's fees in favor of appellee Suzanne Combs, which was based on a $1,000 offer to settle made pursuant to section 45.061.See also Knealing v. Puleo, 675 So.2d 593 (Fla. 1996). We affirm as to the other points raised on appeal.

On remand, the trial court shall enter an amended final judgment on Count VII in favor of appellant and against appellees HSSI and Suzanne and Robert Combs in the amount of $38,632.28, with post-judgment interest to run from the date of the original judgment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

GLICKSTEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mesher v. Combs

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 15, 1997
685 So. 2d 1391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Mesher v. Combs

Case Details

Full title:JAMES A. MESHER, Appellant, v. ROBERT A. COMBS, SUZANNE H. COMBS a/k/a…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 15, 1997

Citations

685 So. 2d 1391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Nguyen v. Perspective Glob.

(citing Jaar v. Univ. of Miami, 474 So.2d 239, 245 (Fla 3d DCA 1985)). Even "[w]here it is shown, without…

Carran v. Morgan

In other words, "no amount of involvement with the business of the seller will overcome the absence of…