From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mesa v. Violante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 23, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Defendants, James R. Violante and Nancy A. Violante, are the owners of the residential property at which the plaintiff was injured. They are also respectively, the President and Secretary of the third-party defendant, Island Garden Landscaping Contracting, Inc. (hereinafter Island), of which the plaintiff was an employee at the time of the accident. It is undisputed that the plaintiff was performing work for Island at the time he was injured. Since the plaintiff received workers' compensation for his injury, recovery from the defendants is, therefore, barred, as the defendants are coemployees of the plaintiff. "Regardless of [their] status as owner[s] of the premises where the injury occurred [the Violantes remain] * * * coemployee[s] in [their] relations with plaintiff in all matters arising from and connected with their employment" (Heritage v. Van Patten, 59 N.Y.2d 1017, 1019). Therefore, the motion court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

We have examined the plaintiff's remaining contentions, and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mesa v. Violante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Mesa v. Violante

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO A.L. MESA, Appellant, v. JAMES R. VIOLANTE et al., Defendants and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 224

Citing Cases

Vanerstrom v. Strasser

liable under the common law or Labor Law § 200 where there is no dangerous condition on the premises, and…

Sciammetta v. Reiff & Assocs., LLC

It would be premature to dismiss such claims in that it is not clear as a matter of law whether all of the…