From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercer v. James

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-20

In the Matter of James R. MERCER Jr., Petitioner, v. Randy K. JAMES, as Superintendent of Livingston Correctional Facility, Respondent.

James R. Mercer Jr., Sonyea, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.



James R. Mercer Jr., Sonyea, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, MALONE JR., McCARTHY and GARRY, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

While performing a cell search of petitioner's cube, a correction officer found, among other things, a hockey ball similar to the type used in the facility for sports activities. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of contraband and stealing state property. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the documentary evidence indicating that a state-issued hockey ball was found in petitioner's cell, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Nimmons v. Fischer, 85 A.D.3d 1460, 1461, 926 N.Y.S.2d 194 [2011];Matter of West v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 81 A.D.3d 1016, 1017, 916 N.Y.S.2d 851 [2011] ). Petitioner's assertion that he brought the item with him from another facility was contradicted by, among other things, documentary evidence at the hearing and, in any event, created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Silverstein v. Bezio, 65 A.D.3d 1424, 1425, 886 N.Y.S.2d 509 [2009] ).

Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Mercer v. James

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Mercer v. James

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of James R. MERCER Jr., Petitioner, v. Randy K. JAMES, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
951 N.Y.S.2d 248
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6237

Citing Cases

Spirles v. Laramay

Substantial evidence in the record, including the misbehavior report, petitioner's property intake sheet and…