From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merced v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1996
225 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 4, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

At the time of her death, the decedent was survived by six children, all of whom were distributees of her estate and two of whom had already reached the age of majority. The plaintiff, the administrator of the decedent's estate, commenced this action after the two-year Statute of Limitations had expired ( see, EPTL 5-4.1). We reject the plaintiff's contention that the Statute of Limitations was tolled until a guardian was appointed for the infant children. Since the two adult children were potential personal representatives who could have commenced the action, the infancy of the remaining children did not toll the Statute of Limitations ( see, Ratka v St. Francis Hosp., 44 N.Y.2d 604; cf., Hernandez v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 687). Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Merced v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1996
225 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Merced v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET MERCED Appellant, v. WYCKOFF HEIGHTS MEDICAL CENTER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 81