Opinion
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01592 JRC
01-05-2018
SHEILA R. MERCADO, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)
This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 and Local Magistrate Judge Rule MJR 13 (see also Notice of Initial Assignment to a U.S. Magistrate Judge and Consent Form, Dkt. 5; Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge, Dkt. 6). This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). See Dkt. 28. Defendant has no objection to plaintiff's motion. See Dkt. 30.
The Court may allow a reasonable fee for an attorney who represented a Social Security Title II claimant before the Court and obtained a favorable judgment, as long as such fee is not in excess of 25 percent of the total of past-due benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1); Grisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002). When a contingency agreement applies, the Court will look first to such agreement and will conduct an independent review to assure the reasonableness of the fee requested, taking into consideration the character of the representation and results achieved. See Grisbrecht, supra, 535 U.S. at 807, 808 (footnote omitted) (citations omitted). Although the fee agreement is the primary means for determining the fee, the Court will adjust the fee downward if substandard representation was provided, if the attorney caused excessive delay, or if a windfall would result from the requested fee. See Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Grisbrecht, supra, 535 U.S. at 808).
Here, the representation was standard, at least, and the results achieved excellent (see Dkt. 29, Attachment 3). See Grisbrecht, supra, 535 U.S. at 808. Following remand from this Court for further consideration (see Dkt. 24), plaintiff was awarded benefits. There has not been excessive delay and no windfall will result from the requested fee.
Plaintiff's total back payment was $43,218.00 (see Dkt. 29, Attachment 3, p. 5). Plaintiff has moved for a net attorney's fee of $2,461.88 (see Motion, Dkt. 28, p. 1), and the Court has considered plaintiff's voluntarily reduced gross attorney's fee of $8,500.00 and the EAJA award received by plaintiff's attorney in the amount of $6,038.12. Parish v. Comm'r. Soc. Sec. Admin., 698 F.3d 1215, 1221 (9th Cir. 2012).
Based on plaintiff's unopposed motion and supporting documents (see Dkt. 28, Dkt. 29 Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4), it is hereby ORDERED that attorney's fees in the amount of $8,500 be awarded to plaintiff's attorney pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), which after the deduction of $6,038.12 representing the EAJA fees already received, leaves a net award of $2,461.88. The Social Security Administration is directed to pay Francisco Rodriquez, Esq., $2,461.88, minus any processing fees allowed by statute, at P.O. Box 31844, Seattle WA 98103.
Dated this 5th day of January, 2018.
/s/_________
J. Richard Creatura
United States Magistrate Judge