From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meras Eng'g Inc. v. CH2O, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2013
Case No. C12-02738 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C12-02738 EMC

03-14-2013

MERAS ENGINEERING INC., a California Corporation, and CHAD WALROD, Plaintiffs, v. CH2O, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Defendant(s)

CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP DAWN M. ROSS KIMBERLY CORCORAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAVIES PEARSON, P.C. PETER T. PETRICH REBECCA M. LARSON Appearance Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Defendant CH 2


DAWN M. ROSS (SBN 143028)
KIMBERLY CORCORAN (148229) CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

(1) STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL (FRCP 10(a)) and (2) [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Complaint Filed: 05/29/2012


Honorable Edward M. Chen


I.


STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs Meras Engineering and Chad Walrod (herein "Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and Defendant CH2O Inc. ("herein Defendant"), on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this action on May 29, 2012 (docket 1); and

WHEREAS, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint on July 12, 2012 (docket 14); and

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2013, the Court issued an order in a Related Case, Meras Engineering Inc., et al. v. CH2O, Inc., et al., Case number C 3:11-00389 EMC (docket 87 in case C 3:11-00389 EMC), by which that Related Case was dismissed on the basis of a contractual choice of venue clause;

WHEREAS, the parties to this case reviewed the contractual language at issue in this case and determined that it was sufficiently similar that the court may dismiss this action as well on the basis of contractual venue, even though the parties still dispute the enforceability of the subject venue clause;

WHEREAS, there is already an action pending between CH2O, Inc. and Chad Walrod in the Washington State courts on issues that are similar to those presented by this case; and

WHEREAS, the parties to this case have entered into an agreement by which they mutually waive fees and costs related to this action in contemplation of the parties' mutual agreement to dismiss this case without prejudice.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by this reference.

2. In consideration of this Stipulation, the parties agree to a full and complete mutual waiver of any claim for any attorneys' fees or costs incurred to date in the prosecution and defense of this action as set forth in the parties' "Mutual Waiver of Fees and Costs re: California-Based Action."

3. Plaintiffs shall file this Stipulation with the Court, requesting an order dismissing this action without prejudice

Respectfully Submitted,

CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP

By: ________

DAWN M. ROSS

KIMBERLY CORCORAN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

DAVIES PEARSON, P.C.

By: ________

PETER T. PETRICH REBECCA M. LARSON

Appearance Pro Hac Vice

Attorneys for Defendant CH2O, Inc.

II.


[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

The Honorable Edward M. Chen

Judge of the United States District Court


Summaries of

Meras Eng'g Inc. v. CH2O, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 14, 2013
Case No. C12-02738 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Meras Eng'g Inc. v. CH2O, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MERAS ENGINEERING INC., a California Corporation, and CHAD WALROD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. C12-02738 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)