From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mentzer v. Vaikutyte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2018
Case No. CV 16-1687 DMG (SS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-1687 DMG (SS)

04-03-2018

WILLIAM M. MENTZER, Plaintiff, v. J. VAIKUTYTE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. \\ \\ \\ \\

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: April 3, 2018

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mentzer v. Vaikutyte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2018
Case No. CV 16-1687 DMG (SS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Mentzer v. Vaikutyte

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM M. MENTZER, Plaintiff, v. J. VAIKUTYTE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 16-1687 DMG (SS) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2018)