From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendrykowski v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 03-00732.

December 31, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Marshall, J.), entered December 5, 2002, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint.

SIEGEL, KELLEHER KAHN, BUFFALO (MARCIE J. MASON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

PHILLIPS, LYTLE, HITCHCOCK, BLAINE HUBER LLP, BUFFALO (WILLIAM D. CHRIST OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Before: PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries that she sustained when the bicycle she was riding struck defendant's parked truck. Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Even assuming, arguendo, that the truck was improperly parked, we conclude as a matter of law that the location of the truck "merely furnished the condition or occasion for the occurrence of the event" and was not one of its causes ( Sheenan v. City of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 496, 503; see also Long v. Cleary, 273 A.D.2d 799, 800-801, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 763; see generally Price v. Hampson, 142 A.D.2d 974, 975). Plaintiff's speculation that the proximity of the truck to the fire hydrant or the absence of cones to warn of its presence caused the accident is insufficient to raise an issue of fact ( see Pank v. Village of Canajoharie, 275 A.D.2d 508, 509; Long, 273 A.D.2d at 800). Because plaintiff's unsworn statement constitutes a statement against interest, the court properly relied on that statement in determining that plaintiff was not looking where she was going at the time of her accident ( see Ferrara v. Poranski, 88 A.D.2d 904).


Summaries of

Mendrykowski v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Mendrykowski v. New York Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:DENISE MENDRYKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1410 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 874

Citing Cases

Gerrity v. Muthana

Defendant met its burden on the motion by establishing as a matter of law that the sole proximate cause of…

Spence v. Lake Service Station, Inc.

"While negligence cases do not generally lend themselves to resolution by motion for summary judgment, such a…