From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 27, 2012
Case No. 8:11-cv-686-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 8:11-cv-686-T-33TGW

04-27-2012

TANIA MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 18), entered on March 21, 2012, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying social security benefits be affirmed. As of this date, neither party has filed an objection to the report and recommendation, and the time for the parties to file such objections has elapsed.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).

In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge, and the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 18), entered on March 21, 2012, is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
(2) The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying benefits is AFFIRMED.

(3) The clerk is directed to close this case and to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner reflecting that the Commissioner's decision denying benefits is affirmed. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 27th day of April, 2012.

____________________________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Mendez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 27, 2012
Case No. 8:11-cv-686-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Mendez v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TANIA MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

Case No. 8:11-cv-686-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Clarence Bros. v. Astrue

Indeed, "findings of fact made by administrative agencies ... may be reversed ... only when the record…