From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendenhall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 1, 1982
419 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-1380.

October 1, 1982.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; David F. Patterson and John S. Andrews, Judges.


Mendenhall filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, containing two allegations, one being that he did not receive all the credit for time served in jail to which he is entitled. Because the record before us does not refute this allegation, we remand this case and direct the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing so that Mendenhall may receive all the jail credit time to which he may be entitled. See Wright v. State, 355 So.2d 870 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Appellant's other allegation has no merit, and we affirm the revocation of his probation.

OTT, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mendenhall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 1, 1982
419 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Mendenhall v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD L. MENDENHALL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 1, 1982

Citations

419 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Vanderblomen v. State

Id. It soon became well-established that postconviction claims for additional presentencing jail or prison…