From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendenhall v. Mendenhall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2004
4 A.D.3d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-06333.

Decided February 2, 2004.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered May 31, 2002, which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff child support in the sum of $580 every other week and an attorney's fee in the sum of $2,000.

Brent M. Albala, Hicksville, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff an attorney's fee in the sum of $2,000; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Judicial Hearing Officer had the authority to issue the judgment of divorce, since an order of reference designating her to hear and determine all issues was made upon consent of the parties ( see CPLR 4317[a]; Perrelli v. Perrelli, 284 A.D.2d 517).

While the parties agreed to joint custody, the plaintiff is the custodial parent within the meaning of Bast v. Rossof ( 91 N.Y.2d 723), and was properly awarded child support from the defendant. Further, we reject the defendant's argument that his child support obligation should be proportionally offset by the amount of time the children spend with him ( see Bast v. Rossof, supra at 730-732).

However, the Supreme Court improvidently awarded the plaintiff an attorney's fee in the sum of $2,000, as the equities of this case dictate that each party pay his or her own attorney's fee ( see Matter of Mullen v. Just, 288 A.D.2d 476, 477, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 613, cert denied 537 U.S. 820).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mendenhall v. Mendenhall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2004
4 A.D.3d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Mendenhall v. Mendenhall

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN R. MENDENHALL, respondent, v. STANFORD MENDENHALL, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 885

Citing Cases

Zema v. Zema

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in…

Ochs v. Ochs

The Supreme Court was not required to apply the statutory percentages found in the Child Support Standards…