From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mena v. Four Wheels Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2000
272 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 26, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered October 13, 1999, which denied defendants' motion for a change of venue from New York County to Suffolk County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Kenneth Marder, for plaintiff-respondent.

Jeffrey K. Van Etten, for defendants-appellants.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


The motion was properly denied in the absence of a plausible explanation for not having made it until a year after the action was commenced, and also after the note of issue had been filed (see, CPLR 511[a]). Defendants' showing of the inconvenience to two witnesses, residents of eastern Nassau and western Suffolk Counties, in having to travel to downtown New York instead of Riverhead, is not sufficiently compelling to counter the unreasonable delay in making the motion.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Mena v. Four Wheels Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2000
272 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Mena v. Four Wheels Co.

Case Details

Full title:CESAR MENA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FOUR WHEELS CO., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 26, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 223 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 74

Citing Cases

Williams v. Bronx Harbor Health Care Complex, Inc.

Although defendant is correct that depositions had yet to be held at the time of the motion, the depositions…

San v. Lesesne

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendants' motion to change venue as…