From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melendez v. Evans

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2013
111 A.D.3d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-7

In the Matter of Michael MELENDEZ, Appellant, v. Andrea EVANS, as Chair of the Division of Parole, Respondent.

Michael Melendez, Woodbourne, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.


Michael Melendez, Woodbourne, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ.

SPAIN, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered October 3, 2012 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

*295In 1991, petitioner was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 25 years to life following his conviction of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. Petitioner appeared before the Board of Parole for the first time in December 2011, at which time the Board declined to release him to parole supervision and ordered him held for an additional 24 months. When petitioner did not receive a timely response to his administrative appeal, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Among the challenges raised by petitioner is a claim that the Board improperly failed to utilize a “COMPAS re-entry risk assessment” instrument as required pursuant to the amendments to Executive Law § 259–c (4), which became effective October 1, 2011 ( see L. 2011, ch. 62, § 1, part C, § 1, subpart A, § 49[f]). For the reasons stated in our decision in Matter of Garfield v. Evans, 108 A.D.3d 830, 968 N.Y.S.2d 262 [2013], handed down after Supreme Court's judgment herein, we agree ( see Matter of Thomas v. Evans, 109 A.D.3d 1069, 971 N.Y.S.2d 487 [2013];Matter of Malerba v. Evans, 109 A.D.3d 1067, 971 N.Y.S.2d 593 [2013] ). In light of the foregoing, petitioner's remaining contentions are academic.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, determination annulled and matter remitted to the Board of Parole for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.

PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY and EGAN Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Melendez v. Evans

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2013
111 A.D.3d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Melendez v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael MELENDEZ, Appellant, v. Andrea EVANS, as Chair of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 7, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7228
974 N.Y.S.2d 294

Citing Cases

Symes v. N.Y. State Bd. of Parole

In response to the amendment, the Board adopted the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for…

Kennedy v. N.Y. State Bd. of Parole

In response to the amendment, the Board adopted the COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for…