From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mejia v. Sanchez

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Aug 30, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00227 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00227

08-30-2022

LORENZO MEJIA, JR., Plaintiff, v. SANCHEZ, Warden; DANIEL P. FERNANDEZ; GENE E. MILLER; ALL MAIL STAFFS; and CIRILDO PUENTE, JR., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the November 29, 2021 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby. (Dkt. No. 7). Magistrate Judge Libby recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff Lorenzo Mejia's complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (Dkt. No. 1), for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

Mejia was provided notice and the opportunity to object. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections were filed, so review is for plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. The Court ACCEPTS the M&R as the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Mejia's complaint, for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 1).

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mejia v. Sanchez

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Aug 30, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00227 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Mejia v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:LORENZO MEJIA, JR., Plaintiff, v. SANCHEZ, Warden; DANIEL P. FERNANDEZ…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 30, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00227 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2022)