From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meiselman v. Central Suffolk Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 5, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated June 15, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant Central Suffolk Hospital to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) upon the plaintiff's failure to serve a complaint.

Before: Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To avoid dismissal for failure to timely serve a complaint after a demand for the complaint has been made pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), a plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving the complaint and a meritorious cause of action ( see, Chmielnik v. Rosenberg, 269 A.D.2d 555; Quinn v. Wenco Food Sys., Co., 269 A.D.2d 437; Culley v. Morrison, 247 A.D.2d 356). The plaintiff failed to comply with either requirement.


Summaries of

Meiselman v. Central Suffolk Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 2000
273 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Meiselman v. Central Suffolk Hospital

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE MEISELMAN, Appellant, v. CENTRAL SUFFOLK HOSPITAL, Respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 436

Citing Cases

Gagnon v. J.S. Intl. Shipping Corp.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. To avoid dismissal for failure to timely serve a complaint…

Brenner v. Cross County Shopping Center

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the respondents' motion pursuant to CPLR…