Opinion
05-01-2015
In the Matter of Amber MEHTA, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Frederick FRANKLIN, Jr., Respondent–Appellant. In the Matter of Frederick Franklin, Jr., Petitioner–Appellant, v. Amber Mehta, Respondent–Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.).
Bouvier Partnership, LLP, Buffalo (Emilio Colaiacovo of Counsel), for Respondent–Appellant and Petitioner–Appellant. Venzon Law Firm P.C., Buffalo (Catharine M. Venzon of Counsel), for Petitioner–Respondent and Respondent–Respondent. James A. Ciminelli, Attorney for the Child, Buffalo.
Bouvier Partnership, LLP, Buffalo (Emilio Colaiacovo of Counsel), for Respondent–Appellant and Petitioner–Appellant.
Venzon Law Firm P.C., Buffalo (Catharine M. Venzon of Counsel), for Petitioner–Respondent and Respondent–Respondent.
James A. Ciminelli, Attorney for the Child, Buffalo.
Opinion
Same memorandum as in Matter of Mehta v. Franklin (Appeal No. 1), 128 A.D.3d 1419, 7 N.Y.S.3d 917, 2015 WL 1950650 (May 1, 2015).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, and VALENTINO, JJ., concur.