holding that § 1-111(f.1) violated plaintiff's substantive due process rights under the Pennsylvania Constitution because the plaintiff's twenty-one-year employment was terminated after the criminal record reporting laws were amended while the plaintiff was employed
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Pa. Dep't of Educ.577 CD 2017
05-01-2018
MEGRAW, P. v. SD OF CHELTENHAM TWP.
Reversed
holding that § 1-111(f.1) violated plaintiff's substantive due process rights under the Pennsylvania Constitution because the plaintiff's twenty-one-year employment was terminated after the criminal record reporting laws were amended while the plaintiff was employed
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Pa. Dep't of Educ.Full title:MEGRAW, P. v. SD OF CHELTENHAM TWP.
Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Date published: May 1, 2018
Numerous Pennsylvania state court plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of § 1-111 and other…