Opinion
December 22, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant merely sponsored the race in which the injured plaintiff participated. The defendant was not in any way involved in the design, layout, maintenance, or control of the race course, and was not in a position to assume such control. Accordingly, the defendant owed no duty of care to the plaintiffs ( see, Mongello v. Davos Ski Resort, 224 A.D.2d 502; Johnson v. Cherry Grove Is. Mgt., 175 A.D.2d 827; McGrath v. United Hosp., 167 A.D.2d 518; Vogel v. West Mtn. Corp., 97 A.D.2d 46).
We reject the plaintiffs' contention that summary judgment is premature because more discovery is needed ( see, Abbenanate v. Tyree Co., 228 A.D.2d 529, 530).
Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman, Krausman and Lerner, JJ., concur.