From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meeker v. Mayfair Cleaners and Dyers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

November, 1934.


Order from which an appeal is taken, granted July 9, 1934, modified by striking therefrom the words "now due and unpaid or," contained in the first ordering paragraph of the order which it resettles, and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. The receiver appointed on the motion of the second mortgagee on May 15, 1933, held possession of the premises as the representative of the said mortgagee. Particularly was this true after the foreclosure and sale of the property on September 27, 1933, although the plaintiff did not fully consummate the sale by taking a deed from the referee. The rents that accrued prior to the extension of the receivership to the plaintiff's first mortgage by the order of March 23, 1934, even though unpaid, were applicable to the payment of any deficiency arising on the foreclosure sale. ( New York Life Ins. Co. v. Fulton Development Corp., 241 App. Div. 103.) Lazansky, P.J., Young and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent on the ground that unpaid rents belong to the receiver under the first mortgage, under authority of Palmieri v. New York Preparatory School ( 232 App. Div. 848) and cases there cited, being of the opinion that the second mortgagee is in no better position than the owner.


Summaries of

Meeker v. Mayfair Cleaners and Dyers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Meeker v. Mayfair Cleaners and Dyers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HIRAM E. MEEKER, as Receiver of the FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN MAMARONECK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Kaplan v. Louis-Anne Realty Co., Inc.

The fund in question having accrued in the hands of the receiver prior to the date of the order extending the…

Dinin v. Colonna

In our opinion, the plaintiff was entitled to the amount of rent collected by the receiver which accrued…