From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 24, 1982
411 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-378.

March 24, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, Roger F. Dykes, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender; Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Certified Legal Intern, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Appellant entered a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement wherein the State agreed, with the trial court's approval, that "the maximum period of incarceration that [appellant] would face would be one year under the agreement." Subsequently, appellant was given a true split sentence as authorized by section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1981), committing him to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a term of three years, but providing that, after serving one year in prison, the imposition of the remainder of the sentence imposed be stayed and withheld and appellant be placed on probation for a period of two years. Appellant directly appeals from the sentence, arguing that the sentence imposed violates the plea agreement.

Appellant made no objection at the time of the imposition of sentencing, nor has he made a motion to reduce the sentence on the ground that it violated the plea agreement or otherwise given the trial court an opportunity to consider if the plea agreement was ambiguous as stated and, if so, what the intent of the parties was with respect to the possibility of up to two additional years of confinement in the event of a violation of probation during the two year period of probation. Any question about these matters should be first raised in the trial court. If appellant is aggrieved by the trial court's construction of the plea agreement, appellant can move the court to permit him to withdraw his plea. If appellant is aggrieved by the trial court's ruling on his motion to withdraw his plea, he can appeal to this court. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla. 1979); Orr v. State, 402 So.2d 535 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

See, for example, Orr v. State, 402 So.2d 535 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), where such a motion was made.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C.J., and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., concur.


Summaries of

Medina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 24, 1982
411 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Medina v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MEDINA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 24, 1982

Citations

411 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

McIntyre v. State

Section 947.16, Florida Statutes (1981). Since the record shows that McIntyre neither objected to this aspect…

Everett v. State

As Everett made no objection below, nor moved to withdraw the pleas, he cannot assert error for the first…