Summary
finding that an ALJ appropriately rejected a treating physician's opinion when the claimant was treated only nine times, and for a limited set of ailments which were not severe impairments
Summary of this case from Sharrard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Opinion
Case No. 1:07cv1010.
November 13, 2008
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on October 22, 2008 (Doc. 12).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) consistent with the opinion of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.