From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meador v. Houchens

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 29, 2008
279 F. App'x 385 (6th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-5782.

May 29, 2008.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.

Before: NORRIS, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.


Plaintiff-appellant Clessie Meador sustained injuries in a grocery store when soft drinks fell on top of him. He and his wife, Sondra Meador, sued defendant-appellee Indiana Insurance Company, the grocery store's insurance provider. He argues that the insurance company violated the Kentucky Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act by failing to pay his claim in good faith.

Having reviewed the parties' briefs and the applicable law and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that a panel opinion further addressing the issues raised would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Therefore, on the grounds identified by the district court, we affirm the district court's judgment in favor of Indiana Insurance Company.


Summaries of

Meador v. Houchens

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 29, 2008
279 F. App'x 385 (6th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Meador v. Houchens

Case Details

Full title:Clessie MEADOR, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOUCHENS INDUSTRIES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: May 29, 2008

Citations

279 F. App'x 385 (6th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Minter v. Libert Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Even this Court has, not coincidentally, steadfastly agreed. Meador v. Indiana Ins. Co., No. 1:05CV206TBR,…