requiring plaintiff to prove abuse of a conditional privilege
Summary of this case from Crowe v. Sobieski Servs., Inc.No. 376, 2004.
May 12, 2005.
Appeal from the Superior Court, New Castle County, CA 03C-05-013.
Decision without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
requiring plaintiff to prove abuse of a conditional privilege
Summary of this case from Crowe v. Sobieski Servs., Inc.Full title:MEADES v. WILMINGTON HOUSING AUTHORITY
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: May 12, 2005
Pierce v. Burns. 185 A.2d 477, 479 (Del. 1962). The court determines whether the privilege applies, and the…
Valentin v. WysockBut the Delaware Supreme Court has clarified that such statements are only conditionally privileged. See…