From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meaders v. White

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 11, 1967
157 S.E.2d 753 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

43083.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 6, 1967.

DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 1967.

Demurrer ruling and amendment. White Superior Court. Before Judge Kenyon.

Stewart, Sartain Carey, Jack M. Carey, for appellant.

Robinson, Thompson, Buice Harben, C. Frank Strickland, Jr., Maylon K. London, for appellees.


1. The unappealed-from judgment of March 30, 1967, sustaining the general demurrer to the petition, fixed the law of the case as to the insufficiency of the petition to set out a cause of action, unless a valid amendment, filed within the 15 days allowed by the order, cured this defect. Bryan v. Digby, 112 Ga. App. 134 (1) ( 144 S.E.2d 230) and cit.

2. Merely filing an amendment within the 15-day period without having it allowed by the court was not sufficient to constitute such purported amendment a part of the record in the case. White v. City of Manchester, 92 Ga. App. 642, 643 (1) ( 89 S.E.2d 581) and cit.

3. Since no valid, timely amendment was allowed, it was error to allow an amendment thereafter. Northside Manor, Inc. v. Vann, 219 Ga. 298, 299 ( 133 S.E.2d 32). See especially Georgia Ports Authority v. Pushay, 223 Ga. 616 (S.E.2d ).

It follows that the court erred in its judgment overruling the defendant's motion to strike the untimely amendment and dismiss the petition.

Judgment reversed. Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 6, 1967 — DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 1967.


Summaries of

Meaders v. White

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 11, 1967
157 S.E.2d 753 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

Meaders v. White

Case Details

Full title:MEADERS v. WHITE et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 11, 1967

Citations

157 S.E.2d 753 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)
157 S.E.2d 753