From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.D.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 1, 2006
936 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 5D05-3330.

September 1, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Anthony H. Johnson, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We strike the assessment of the fine set forth in section 939.185, Florida Statutes (2005), as it has no application in juvenile proceedings. See V.K.E. v. State, 934 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). We affirm the trial court's order denying suppression of M.D.J.'s statement to law enforcement as we agree that M.D.J, was not the subject of a custodial interrogation.

AFFIRMED; FINE STRICKEN.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

M.D.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 1, 2006
936 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

M.D.J. v. State

Case Details

Full title:M.D.J., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 1, 2006

Citations

936 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

T.L.S. v. State

There is no mention of delinquency in the statutory provision and, therefore, based on the holding in V.K.E.,…

S.F. v. State

On the same ground, neither the $65 additional court cost nor the $85 temporary criminal surcharge authorized…