From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McSween v. Newmar Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 25, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-00603-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-00603-CG-M.

October 25, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 84); the objection of the plaintiffs, Ginger and Larry McSween ("the McSweens") to the report and recommendation (Doc. 86); and the response of the defendants, Dometic Corporation and Dometic, LLC ("Dometic") to the McSweens' objection (Doc. 90).

The magistrate judge recommended that the motions to dismiss filed by defendants, Newmar Corporation ("Newmar") and Dometic (Docs. 73 and 74), be granted, and that Counts X and XI of the complaint be dismissed. See Doc. 84. The magistrate judge further recommended that all the substantive rights of the McSweens be determined by Florida's substantive law. Id. Upon a de novo review of those portions of the report and recommendation to which the objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. The court therefore finds that the defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 73 and 74) should be GRANTED and that the substantive rights of the Plaintiffs in this action will be determined by the law of the State of Florida. It is ORDERED that Counts X and XI of the plaintiffs' complaint be and are hereby DISMISSED. DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

McSween v. Newmar Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 25, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-00603-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

McSween v. Newmar Corporation

Case Details

Full title:GINGER McSWEEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEWMAR CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-00603-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Oct. 25, 2011)