From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
324 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2283

09-22-2021

Thomas MCNEIL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Thomas McNeil, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Thomas McNeil, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. DISMISSED. See English v. McCrary , 348 So. 2d 293, 296–97 (Fla. 1977) (explaining that prohibition "is preventive and not corrective," the purpose of which "is to prevent the doing of something, not to compel the undoing of something already done"); Sparkman v. McClure , 498 So. 2d 892, 895 (Fla. 1986) (explaining that prohibition "cannot be utilized to revoke an order already entered" and that it "will not lie where the proceedings below have already been completed").

Ray, Jay, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McNeil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
324 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

McNeil v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas MCNEIL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

324 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)