McNeil v. State

Full title: Brenton McNEIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Apr 24, 2015

163 So. 3d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D13–1810.

04-24-2015

Brenton McNEIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Michael R. Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ORFINGER, J.

Michael R. Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION

ORFINGER, J.

Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, Appellant, Brenton McNeil, moved for certification of a question of great public importance. We grant the motion and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) as one of great public importance:

ARE THE COSTS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED “PER CASE” OR “PER COUNT”?

QUESTION CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.