From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Hughes

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Nov 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv641-TMH (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv641-TMH.

November 16, 2009


ORDER AND OPINION


On October 21, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 18). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that:

1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Houston County Jail.
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Houston County Jail.


Summaries of

McNeal v. Hughes

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Nov 16, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv641-TMH (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2009)
Case details for

McNeal v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO McNEAL, Plaintiff, v. ANDY HUGHES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 16, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv641-TMH (M.D. Ala. Nov. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Hancock v. Hood

418 F.3d at 1159. See alsoBrown v. Sikes, 212 F.3d 1205, 1207 (11th Cir. 2000) ("[W]hen a state provides a…