From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNairy v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-323 Erie (W.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-323 Erie.

November 16, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 31, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10], filed on October 27, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be dismissed as moot. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as moot.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on October 27, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

McNairy v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-323 Erie (W.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2006)
Case details for

McNairy v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT McNAIRY, Petitioner, v. JAMES SHERMAN, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 16, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-323 Erie (W.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2006)

Citing Cases

Mars Area Sch. Dist. v. Los

Even though the prisoner may have been released from prison by the time his claim for habeas relief is filed,…