From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNabb v. Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1934
175 S.E. 718 (N.C. 1934)

Opinion

(Filed 19 September, 1934.)

APPEAL by defendants from Devin, J., at May Term, 1934, of DARE.

Thompson Wilson for plaintiff.

Worth Horner for defendants.


Civil action for damages arising out of a collision between plaintiff's automobile and a Ford coach, owned by the defendant F. G. Murphy and operated at the time by his minor son, Darrell Murphy. The scene of the injury was Highway No. 34, three miles north of Elizabeth City; the time about 2:00 a.m., 25 December, 1931.

The liability of F. G. Murphy was made to turn on the "family-purpose" doctrine, which obtains in this jurisdiction. Grier v. Woodside, 200 N.C. 759, 158 S.E. 491.

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff against both of the defendants, from which they appeal, assigning errors.


On trial, the case resolved itself into controverted issues of fact, which the jury found in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants. The evidence supports the verdict, and no error has been made to appear in the trial of the cause. The judgment, therefore, will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

McNabb v. Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1934
175 S.E. 718 (N.C. 1934)
Case details for

McNabb v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE McNABB v. F. G. MURPHY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1934

Citations

175 S.E. 718 (N.C. 1934)
175 S.E. 718

Citing Cases

Small v. Mallory

The sole question presented for decision on this appeal challenges the correctness of the ruling of the trial…

Ewing v. Thompson

Such finding of fact by the judge is conclusive on appeal. Bigham v. Foor, supra; Crabtree v. Sales Co., 217…