From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMillian v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jan 6, 1993
844 S.W.2d 749 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 1003-90.

January 6, 1993.

Appeal from 351st Judicial District Court, Harris County; Lupe Salinas, Judge.

Douglas M. O'Brien, court appointed on appeal, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty. Alan Curry, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appellant was convicted in a trial by jury of the felony offense of aggravated assault. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 22.02(a)(1). The jury assessed punishment at ten years' confinement and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's conviction in an opinion on rehearing. McMillian v. State, 799 S.W.2d 311 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1990). We granted appellant's petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred by holding that unadjudicated extraneous offenses were properly admitted at the punishment phase of appellant's trial in response to his application for probation.

The Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of our recent opinion in Grunsfeld v. State, 843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Cr.App., No. 1037-91, delivered October 28, 1992).

Therefore, we grant appellant's petition for discretionary review. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause remanded to that court for reconsideration of the issues presented.


Summaries of

McMillian v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jan 6, 1993
844 S.W.2d 749 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)
Case details for

McMillian v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward McMILLIAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Jan 6, 1993

Citations

844 S.W.2d 749 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

McMillian v. State

We affirmed the trial court's judgment and appellant filed a petition for discretionary review. See McMillian…

Peters v. State

The high Court's only opinion expressly discussing the admissibility of probation-suitability evidence under…