From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMillian v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 6, 2014
NO. 4:12-CV-661-A (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 4:12-CV-661-A

01-06-2014

SUZY McMILLIAN, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

On October 24, 2013, the court received the proposed findings and conclusions and the recommendation of the magistrate judge (hereinafter "FC&R") to whom the above-captioned action was referred. On November 8, 2013, the court received objections by plaintiff, Suzy McMillian, to the FC&R, and on November 25, 2013, the court received the response of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration to those objections. After having considered the pertinent parts of the record, the court has concluded that the recommendation of the magistrate judge that the court affirm the Commissioner's decision is correct, and that the proposed findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby, adopted. Therefore,

The court ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security that, based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits protectively filed by plaintiff on April 20, 2010, plaintiff is not disabled under §§ 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act is affirmed.

SIGNED January 6, 2014.

/s/_________

JOHN McBRYDE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McMillian v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Jan 6, 2014
NO. 4:12-CV-661-A (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2014)
Case details for

McMillian v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:SUZY McMILLIAN, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2014

Citations

NO. 4:12-CV-661-A (N.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Saul

However, the courts split as to whether an RFC determination that a claimant is limited to simple, routine…

Sun v. Colvin

When the ALJ fails in this duty, he does not have sufficient facts on which to make an informed decision and…