From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLennan v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0531-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0531-G (BF)

07-30-2012

ROBERT V. McLENNAN, Plaintiff, v. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The court has under consideration the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections were filed. The district court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of Kerri Veitch ("Veitch"), Larry Garrett ("Garrett"), Larry Davis ("Davis"), Randle Efflandt ("Efflandt"), Reggie Bonner ("Bonner") and Kelly McNair ("McNair") (collectively referred to as "Individual Defendants") (docket entry 12) is hereby GRANTED and plaintiff's claims against individual defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

________________________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

McLennan v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0531-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

McLennan v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT V. McLENNAN, Plaintiff, v. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC, ET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0531-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 30, 2012)

Citing Cases

Leilenett H. Mkt. v. Extended Stay Am.

Therefore, the court will act in accordance with other district courts in this circuit and other circuits in…

Chung v. Cartier N. Am., Inc.

Nevertheless, any § 1981 claims against “non-supervising employees must be dismissed.” McLennan v. Oncor…