From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLean v. Sachem Cent. Sch. Dist.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 5, 2020
186 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2016–11953 Index No. 19038/12

08-05-2020

Marilyn MCLEAN, et al., Respondents, v. SACHEM CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Christopher Clayton of counsel), for appellant. Ray, Mitev & Associates, LLP, Miller Place, N.Y. (Vesselin Mitev of counsel), for respondents.


Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Christopher Clayton of counsel), for appellant.

Ray, Mitev & Associates, LLP, Miller Place, N.Y. (Vesselin Mitev of counsel), for respondents.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Sachem Central School District appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (William B. Rebolini, J.), dated September 15, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Sachem Central School District and granted that branch of the plaintiffs' cross motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract insofar as asserted against the defendant Sachem Central School District.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho , 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment ( McLean v. Sachem Cent. Sch. Dist. , 186 A.D.3d 470, 129 N.Y.S.3d 170, 2020 WL 4495844 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2018–13902; decided herewith]; see CPLR 5501[a][1] ).

BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McLean v. Sachem Cent. Sch. Dist.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Aug 5, 2020
186 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

McLean v. Sachem Cent. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Marilyn McLean, et al., respondents, v. Sachem Central School District…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 5, 2020

Citations

186 A.D.3d 470 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
186 A.D.3d 470
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4387

Citing Cases

Petkanas v. Petkanas

We agree with the plaintiff's contention that the defendants waived the defense of lack of standing, as they…

GMAC Mortg. v. Coombs

The purpose of the 1996 amendment to CPLR 3211(e), which added the 60–day time limit, was " ‘to require a…