From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLaughlin v. Vanhouten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 7, 2001
283 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted April 11, 2001.

May 7, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated July 31, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion for renewal and, upon renewal, in effect, vacated a prior order of the same court, dated April 19, 2000, granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), and denied that motion.

McCabe Mack, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kimberly Hunt of counsel), for appellant.

Janis L. Errichetti, Goshen, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, McGINITY, SMITH and COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for renewal (see, Matter of PKS Dev. Co. v. Kahn Lbr. Millwork Co., 187 A.D.2d 656). Further, there is a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). Thus, summary judgment was properly denied to the defendant (see, Kominik v. Rodriguez, 273 A.D.2d 358).


Summaries of

McLaughlin v. Vanhouten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 7, 2001
283 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

McLaughlin v. Vanhouten

Case Details

Full title:LAURA J. MCLAUGHLIN, RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD W. VANHOUTEN, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 7, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 407 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 894